by MustafaMukhtar, MBA, ITIL
Consultant/Content Contributor, E-N Computers
20+ years of experience in IT management, project planning, enterprise systems and user support
Updated April 22, 2026
Microsoft 365 GCC High is often described as “required for CMMC” — but that’s not technically accurate.
CMMC itself doesn’t mandate GCC High. What actually pushes most organizations toward it is their contract. DoD contracts typically require that any cloud service handling sensitive defense information meet specific federal security standards — and commercial Microsoft 365 doesn’t meet them.
That’s why defense contractors evaluating Microsoft 365 typically end up choosing between GCC and GCC High rather than staying in commercial Microsoft 365 — but the right answer depends on your specific situation.
In practice, the decision usually comes down to three things:
- Export-controlled data (ITAR/EAR)
- Prime contractor requirements
- The risk of having to redo everything later
This guide helps you figure out what actually applies to your situation, so you don’t overbuild, under protect, or end up migrating twice.
QUICK ANSWER:
Do I need Microsoft 365 GCC High for CMMC?
CMMC doesn’t require GCC High — your contract does. Most defense contractors end up needing it because they handle export-controlled data, their prime contractor requires it for collaboration, or their contract specifies it. If none of those apply, a less expensive Microsoft 365 environment may meet your requirements.
Table of Contents
- Do you need GCC High? 5-minute decision guide
- The real cost of getting the GCC High decision wrong
- Understanding Microsoft’s government cloud options
- How is Microsoft 365 Government different from Microsoft 365 Commercial?
- How is GCC different from GCC High?
- Why GCC High is a separate environment?
- Comparison between Microsoft 365 options for defense contractors
- Terms explained
- Do I need GCC High for CMMC certification?
- Which Microsoft 365 environment do you need?
- What are the downsides to GCC High?
- Will buying GCC High automatically make us ready for CMMC?
- How much does Microsoft 365 GCC High cost?
- Implementation timeline: what to expect
- Is Microsoft 365 GCC High worth it?
- How do I purchase Microsoft 365 GCC High?
- How we help contractors in the Virginia and DC area
- Next steps
- Frequently Asked Questions
- CMMC resources
Do you need GCC High? A 5-minute decision guide
Answer these questions to quickly determine your requirements:
- Do you handle ITAR-controlled data? → Yes = GCC High required
- Do you process Covered Defense Information (CDI)? → Yes = GCC High recommended
- Does your prime contractor use GCC High? → Yes = GCC High strongly recommended
- Are you pursuing CMMC Level 3 certification? → Yes = GCC High required
- Do you need to guarantee that only US citizens access your data? → Yes = GCC High required
- Does your prime contractor require GCC High for collaboration?
→ Yes = GCC High effectively required (most common real-world trigger)
If you answered “No” to all questions above, you may be able to use standard Microsoft 365 GCC with additional security controls. This requires careful configuration, documented justification, and continuous monitoring.
The real cost of getting the GCC High decision wrong
Providers working with defense contractors have published case studies and estimates on this topic. Based on our experience, defense contractors typically re-evaluate and change their Microsoft environment within one to two years — usually because contract requirements shift or a prime contractor mandates it, usually driven by evolving contract requirements or prime contractor mandates.
The consequences are real. ITAR violations can exceed $1 million per violation. Audit failures lead to contract suspension. Many primes now require GCC High just to share data with subs. And emergency migrations—done under pressure after a compliance gap surfaces—typically cost up to three times more than planned deployments
Tools like Preveil and Virtru address specific CMMC control areas — primarily securing CUI in transmission and storage — but neither replaces the full compliance environment CMMC Level 2 requires. They’re scoping tools, not solutions. Companies that treat them as a complete path to certification typically discover the gap during assessment, not before. At E-N Computers, we’ve helped clients complete CMMC readiness assessments and build clear paths toward implementing the 110 required controls. Two of our engineers are Registered Practitioners with The Cyber AB, and E-N Computers is a Registered Practitioner Organization—so we understand both the compliance requirements and the Microsoft configurations needed to meet them.
If you’re ready to act, we can help—schedule a free 30-minute consultation. But if you’re the type who wants to understand the “why” before making a decision that affects your compliance posture and budget, keep reading.
Understanding Microsoft’s government cloud options
Microsoft offers several government cloud environments—GCC (Government Community Cloud), GCC High, and DoD—each designed for different compliance thresholds. The naming reflects FedRAMP authorization levels: GCC meets FedRAMP Moderate (where a breach would have serious adverse effects), while GCC High meets FedRAMP High (where a breach would have severe or catastrophic effects—think defense, law enforcement, emergency services). The cost differences are significant, so choosing the right one depends on your contract requirements and the type of data you handle.
How is Microsoft 365 Government different from Microsoft 365 Commercial?
MS365 Government data is segregated from commercial MS365 data. GCC data resides in a separate “enclave” of the Azure Commercial cloud, while GCC High and DoD run in a dedicated Azure Government environment called the “US Sovereign Cloud”—data centers located entirely within the United States and operated only by screened U.S. persons.
Most features available to commercial MS365 tenants also exist in GCC and GCC High, but some may be limited or delayed due to compliance requirements.
How is GCC different from GCC High?
Both are MS365 U.S. Government offerings, but they meet different regulatory requirements.
Standard
GCC
- Built on commercial Azure data centers with a U.S. storage enclave
- Some services may process data outside the U.S.
- Global Microsoft support model (non-U.S. persons may access data)
- Supports DFARS 7012 and some CMMC Level 2 requirements, but not approved for export-controlled CUI
Elevated
GCC High
- Built on dedicated U.S. Government data centers
- Supported exclusively by screened U.S. persons
- Contractual guarantee that data never leaves the U.S.
- Required for ITAR and Covered Defense Information (CDI)
- Approved for CMMC Level 2–3
Why GCC High is a separate environment?
GCC High isn’t a configuration of regular Microsoft 365 — it’s a separate environment Microsoft built from the ground up for sensitive government use. That means dedicated data centers, staff who have been screened as U.S. persons, and a contractual guarantee that your data never leaves the country. The compliance bar Microsoft has to meet here is significantly higher than in their standard government or commercial offerings.
Key differences:
Interoperability: GCC High can share only with GCC High and DoD tenants—it cannot natively share with GCC or commercial tenants.
Pricing: GCC High costs 40-70% more due to dedicated infrastructure and support restrictions. Specific pricing varies by license and partner.
Purchasing: GCC High can only be purchased from authorized AOS-G partners (Microsoft-authorized resellers for the Agreement for Online Services – Government program). Eligibility verification is required. E-N Computers works with an AOS-G partner.
What is Microsoft 365 DoD?
Microsoft 365 DoD is nearly identical to GCC High but available only to the Department of Defense. Both operate under the same security framework and allow data sharing only within those environments. Contractors cannot purchase MS365 DoD.
Comparison between Microsoft 365 options for defense contractors
| MS365 Commercial | MS365 GCC | MS365 GCC High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who it’s for | General businesses | Government agencies; contractors with non-export CUI | Defense Industrial Base; contractors handling ITAR/EAR or CDI |
| Environment | Global commercial cloud | U.S. enclave in Azure Commercial; global support staff | Dedicated U.S. Sovereign Cloud; screened U.S. persons only |
| FedRAMP Level | Moderate (equivalent) | FedRAMP Moderate | FedRAMP High |
| Regulations | FCI (CMMC Level 1) | NIST 800-171, DFARS 7012, CJIS, IRS 1075 | ITAR, EAR, DFARS 7012, CMMC Level 2–3 |
| CUI Support | Not approved | Approved for basic CUI (non-export) | Approved for all CUI (including CDI) |
| Cost | Baseline | 10–15% premium over Commercial | 40–70% premium over Commercial |
| How to buy | Any vendor | Authorized government partners | AOS-G partners (E-N Computers works with one); requires eligibility validation |
What CUI, ITAR and FedRAMP actually mean
CUI
Controlled Unclassified Information
Sensitive but unclassified information that requires protection.
CDI
Covered Defense Information
The defense-specific subset — it's CUI that appears in DoD contracts and triggers CMMC compliance requirements.
For GCC High: If your contract includes CDI but no export controls, GCC is technically permitted, but GCC High is strongly recommended for risk mitigation.
ITAR
International Traffic in Arms Regulations
Controls the export of military and defense-related items and technical data on the U.S. Munitions List. In practice, access to this data is limited to U.S. persons unless the State Department has specifically authorized foreign access — and even 'deemed exports' count: showing controlled technical data to a foreign national in the U.S. is treated as an export.
You need to think about ITAR if your contract involves USML items or technical data (CAD models, drawings, or specifications designed for military use). For Microsoft 365, many defense contractors require GCC High when ITAR-controlled technical data will be stored or shared there.
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
The U.S. government's standard security check for cloud services, so agencies don't have to test every cloud on their own. Microsoft 365 GCC High passes FedRAMP High — which is why it's commonly used for sensitive defense data like CUI/CDI and some ITAR work. Microsoft 365 GCC is approved at FedRAMP Moderate. Regular commercial Microsoft 365 is not approved under FedRAMP for this kind of sensitive government data.
Do I need GCC High for CMMC certification?
Not necessarily.
Since 2021, Microsoft has included contractual DFARS 252.204-7012 support in GCC for all types of CUI GCC is authorized to hold. As a result, GCC is suitable for CMMC Level 1 and most Level 2 cases—as long as the CUI is not export-controlled (ITAR/EAR) and the environment is configured correctly.
You need GCC High if any of these apply:
- Your contract includes DFARS 252.204-7012 with export-controlled data (ITAR/EAR) or requires “U.S. Sovereignty” (U.S. Person support)
- You handle CAD files, technical drawings, source code, or other export-controlled technical data
- Your prime contractor or partner mandates GCC High for collaboration
- Your contract explicitly requires GCC High
When your contract doesn’t require it, but your prime does:
In practice, many GCC High decisions are not driven directly by contract language, but by prime contractor requirements.
Even when a subcontractor’s contract doesn’t explicitly mandate GCC High, prime contractors often require it anyway — to simplify collaboration, enforce consistent security boundaries, and reduce their own compliance risk. This “flow-down” effect is one of the most common real-world triggers for GCC High adoption, and one of the most underestimated during early planning.
GCC High is strongly recommended (though not technically required) if:
- Your contract includes CDI (Covered Defense Information) but no export controls—GCC is permitted, but carries more risk
GCC or commercial Microsoft 365 may be sufficient if:
- You handle only FCI (Federal Contract Information), depending on your contract language and risk tolerance
Important clarification on ITAR: ITAR registration alone doesn’t mean you need GCC High. The test is the data itself: Are you handling ITAR-controlled technical data in Microsoft 365? Does your contract or prime require U.S.-only access? If yes to both, you need GCC High. If you’re ITAR-registered but not storing controlled technical data in Microsoft 365, you may not need it.
What if you’re already using PreVeil or a similar enclave tool?
Some contractors use tools like PreVeil or Virtru to protect CUI within a commercial Microsoft 365 environment instead of migrating to GCC High. This can work for narrowly scoped environments, but these tools protect specific data flows — not your entire collaboration environment. External sharing, Teams integrations, and workflows that happen outside the enclave may fall outside your compliant boundary, and prime contractors may require GCC High for direct collaboration regardless of what controls you have in place.
The documentation burden to prove compliance equivalency during an assessment is often heavier than expected, and contractors who start with an enclave approach sometimes end up migrating to GCC High anyway when contract requirements change or collaboration gaps become a problem. If you’re expecting long-term or expanding DoD work, it’s worth pressure-testing the enclave path against your actual contract requirements before committing to it.
Compliance is not automatic
Both GCC and GCC High can meet CMMC requirements, but they must be configured, operated, and monitored correctly. Compliance failures usually come from misconfiguration, over-permissive access, or lack of operational controls—not from the platform itself.
Which Microsoft 365 environment do you need?
The answer depends on your contract language, the type of data you handle, and who you need to collaborate with. Below are four common approaches with real-world scenarios to help you identify your best fit.
Standard Microsoft 365 (Commercial) + security controls
Works only for very small contractors that handle no ITAR, very limited low-risk CUI, and whose prime contractors confirm in writing that Commercial is acceptable. This is increasingly rare and should be validated carefully.
Examples:
- A 5-person subcontractor doing low-risk administrative support work with no ITAR and receiving only FCI
- A consulting firm that never touches drawings, technical data, or export-controlled information—only project management or invoicing support
- A marketing or HR vendor for a defense contractor whose contract explicitly states no CUI is shared
Microsoft 365 GCC
Good fit for organizations that need FedRAMP Moderate, handle CUI that is not ITAR or export-controlled, and whose primes are also operating in GCC or haven’t mandated GCC High. GCC can meet DFARS 7012 for many scenarios when configured correctly.
Examples:
- A contractor doing logistics, warehousing, or facility operations for a DoD base where CUI may appear but is not export-controlled
- A software vendor selling tools to the government, dealing with CUI but not subject to ITAR
- A mid-size subcontractor whose prime runs in GCC and only sends standard CUI (project schedules, basic technical requirements)
A GCC success story: A logistics subcontractor handling only non-export CUI (schedules, invoices) stayed in GCC, implemented tight controls, documented their justification, and passed CMMC assessments without moving to GCC High—saving substantial licensing and operational cost. This approach is feasible when scope is limited and validated.
Microsoft 365 GCC High
Strongest option for defense contractors handling ITAR, export-controlled data, or CDI—or working with primes that require GCC High for collaboration. Safest choice for anyone expecting higher-level CMMC assessments or handling sensitive CUI.
Examples:
- A manufacturing contractor producing components for weapons systems, aircraft, or defense platforms where CAD files or technical drawings are export-controlled
- An engineering firm handling Controlled Technical Information such as schematics, tolerances, performance specs, or testing data
- A prime contractor or subcontractor whose customer mandates GCC High for collaboration and secure data flow
- A contractor preparing for CMMC Level 2 with significant, high-risk CUI
A GCC High success story: A mid-sized engineering and manufacturing firm handling technical drawings and ITAR-controlled CAD files moved to GCC High to meet prime contract requirements. The migration reduced contractual risk, preserved their ability to bid on future work, and avoided costly post-award remediation.
Hybrid approach
Ideal for organizations that want sensitive workflows in GCC High while reducing cost by running general business operations in Commercial or GCC. Requires clear internal data-segmentation policies.
Examples:
- A 200-person company where 10 engineers touch ITAR data, but the remaining 190 staff (HR, finance, sales, customer service) don’t
- A contractor that wants GCC High for DoD project work but needs Commercial for Teams Phone, Power Platform, or other features not available in GCC High
- A firm undergoing CMMC certification but wanting to keep general business operations inexpensive and flexible
CUI enclave approach: a cost-control strategy
An increasingly common alternative is the enclave model, where only the users and systems handling CUI operate inside GCC High while the rest of the organization stays in a commercial environment. Done well, this reduces licensing costs and keeps compliance boundaries tight. Done poorly, it splits your organization into parallel workflows — secure and non-secure — which creates data separation problems, user confusion, and ongoing administrative overhead that can outweigh the savings.
Enclaves are a legitimate option for some organizations, but the decision is less about technical feasibility and more about whether your team can sustain the operational discipline it requires. If you’re weighing this path, our article CUI enclaves in CMMC compliance: Are they right for your business through when it works and when it doesn’t.
Get the GCC High Decision Worksheet
GCC High is expensive, and the wrong call in either direction can cost you a contract or tens of thousands of dollars. Use this worksheet to cut through the confusion and arrive at a defensible, documented decision in under 30 minutes.
What are the downsides to GCC High?
GCC High comes with trade-offs. The gap between GCC High and commercial Microsoft 365 has narrowed considerably—most core tools now have feature parity, and Microsoft’s rollout delays have shortened from 12 months to 3–6 months. Still, limitations remain.
The bottom line is about 90–95% of daily workflows function the same as commercial Microsoft 365. The disruption comes from user expectations and identity differences—not from the inability to do core work.
The remaining friction falls into three categories: collaboration setup, feature gaps, and migration planning.
Collaboration boundaries
GCC High users can collaborate with commercial and GCC tenants, but it requires configuration on both sides. If your partners’ IT teams haven’t set this up, external sharing and Teams meetings won’t work out of the box.
Feature and integration limitations
Many third-party tools now offer government-authorized versions that work with GCC High. But commercial versions of those same tools remain blocked, and setup is often more complex. The table below shows current compatibility status, which changes as vendors obtain FedRAMP authorization.
| Tool / Feature | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Slack, Zoom, Webex | Gov versions only | Requires Zoom for Government or Webex for Government; commercial versions blocked |
| Dropbox, Box, Google Drive | Not supported | Store data outside the U.S. Gov boundary |
| Salesforce, HubSpot, Monday.com | Gov versions only | Requires their Gov-cloud instances; setup more complex than commercial |
| DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign | Available | FedRAMP High-authorized versions now fully integrated |
| Microsoft Copilot* | Available | Launched December 2024; some advanced features still rolling out |
| Power BI | Available | Most features at parity; public web-publishing disabled |
| Viva Engage, Bookings, Planner | Available | Fully migrated as of late 2024 |
| Teams App Store & bots | Curated list only | Admins can enable specific FedRAMP-cleared apps |
Microsoft Copilot is available in GCC High as of late 2025, but adoption in defense contractor environments has been slower than in commercial Microsoft 365. Feature rollout still lags behind commercial, and many organizations are holding off while questions around data governance, AI interaction with CUI, and compliance implications get worked out.
Run a full integrations and dependency inventory before migration. When clients skip this, they discover mid-migration that critical apps, flows, or third-party connectors don’t work—forcing emergency rework, custom engineering, or additional license purchases that cost two to three times the planned migration budget
Common surprises during implementation
These workflow disruptions aren’t obvious from Microsoft’s documentation and typically surface during testing or after migration
The login confusion problem: GCC High operates on a different domain (*.microsoft.us instead of *.microsoft.com). When executives or external partners click a meeting link, they hit an unfamiliar login screen and assume something is broken.
External partner confusion: When collaborating with subcontractors on commercial Microsoft 365, external users appear as “unknown” unless Cross-Tenant Access is configured on both sides. The fix is tenant federation—allowing trusted external users to authenticate with their commercial identities while your data loss prevention policies stay enforced.
Power Automate connector limitations: Automation that works in commercial Microsoft 365 may break or require complete redesign in GCC High due to missing connectors.
Minor feature gaps, not major ones: Most clients expect significant functionality gaps. The reality: core tools—Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, Word, Excel—work well. The friction comes from missing convenience features like GIF libraries in Teams or certain Intune mobile management capabilities.
Migration and operational considerations
Beyond feature limitations, GCC High introduces planning and cost considerations:
- Migration complexity: Full migrations typically take 3–6 months
- Training: Staff need orientation on identity differences and external sharing workflows
- Vendor pricing: Government versions of third-party tools often carry a premium
- Feature delays: New Microsoft features typically roll out 3–6 months later in GCC High
Will buying GCC High automatically make us ready for CMMC?
No. Roughly half of new inquiries we receive start with this false assumption.
GCC High provides compliant infrastructure, but you’re responsible for configuring and operating it correctly. Microsoft guarantees that its data centers, personnel screening, and platform meet FedRAMP High requirements. What happens inside your tenant—access controls, data classification, audit logging, user training, incident response, continuous monitoring—is on you.
Compliance requires people, process, and technology working together. You need System Security Plans, policies, ongoing training, and proper configuration. GCC High is the foundation; building a compliance program on top of it is the work.
Most contractors work with a partner who understands both the technology and the compliance framework. Projects that skip this step typically end up under-resourced and fail assessments.
Compliance at a glance
| Commercial | GCC | GCC High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FedRAMP Moderate | No | Yes | Yes |
| FedRAMP High | No | No | Yes |
| NIST 800-171 | Not intended | Yes | Yes |
| CMMC Level 1 | Yes* | Yes | Yes |
| CMMC Level 2 | No | Partial** | Yes |
| CMMC Level 3 | No | No | Yes |
| ITAR / Export-controlled CUI | No | No | Yes |
* Level 1 has no CUI requirements, so any environment can technically support it.
** GCC supports CMMC Level 2 for non-export-controlled CUI only. If your contract involves ITAR or EAR data, you need GCC High.
How much does Microsoft 365 GCC High cost?
The short answer: expect materially higher licensing costs than commercial Microsoft 365, plus meaningful one-time implementation and compliance work. Real-world projects consistently land higher than many online estimates.
Why does GCC High cost more?
The licensing premium covers Microsoft’s overhead for maintaining separate infrastructure, U.S.-person staffing requirements, and FedRAMP High compliance. Implementation costs are higher because you’re not just migrating data—you’re rebuilding security configurations, replacing integrations that don’t work in GCC High, and training users on new workflows.
Licensing tiers
GCC High is available as Microsoft 365 F3, E3, and E5, or Office 365 F1, E1, E3, and E5. Microsoft 365 versions include security features and Windows licensing; Office 365 versions cover only the Office suite, Exchange, and collaboration tools. F1/F3 licenses don’t include desktop Office applications and carry a smaller premium (~15% over commercial).
The licensing shift most small contractors miss
Microsoft introduced Microsoft 365 Business Premium for GCC High in November 2025, lowering the entry point for smaller contractors. Before that, GCC High generally required higher-tier government licensing.
Business Premium can be a lower-cost starting point, but total cost still depends on your compliance scope — many CMMC Level 2 environments need additional security and compliance capabilities that come with higher license tiers.
Real-world example: 20–25 users on Microsoft 365 GCC High
Based on a recent signed GCC High engagement for a small defense contractor, here’s what a realistic first-year budget looks like:
| Category | Estimated cost |
|---|---|
| Licensing (Microsoft 365 G5 GCC High + add-ons) | $25,000/year |
| Migration & implementation | $35,000–$55,000 |
| CMMC documentation & evidence preparation | ~$45,000 |
| Migration tools & logging infrastructure | $2,500–$3,000 |
| Hardware (SIEM/log collection) | ~$1,200 |
| First-year total (licenses + one-time costs) | $100,000–$120,000 |
After year one, the ongoing premium is primarily the licensing difference plus 10–20% higher IT operations costs for compliance management, which includes access reviews, audit evidence, policy enforcement, and continuous monitoring.
Security tooling costs by tier
What’s included varies by licensing level:
- E5 customers: Most security tools are bundled—DLP, MFA, endpoint protection, SIEM, vulnerability management, compliance reporting. Expect roughly $85/user/month all-in.
- E3 customers: Budget $50–200/user/year for additional security tools like eDiscovery, MDR, or enhanced DLP.
Implementation timeline: what to expect
Plan for longer than you think. Microsoft’s eligibility verification alone can take several weeks, and procurement typically adds another month before any technical work begins. The technical migration itself is rarely what causes delays — internal approvals, vendor coordination, and changing scope are the usual culprits.
As a rule of thumb, start the evaluation process 6–9 months before you need GCC High operational. Smaller or simpler organizations can sometimes do it in 3–6 months. If your environment is complex, give yourself 9–12.
What “complex” means in practice:
- Straightforward: You’re moving a small team, minimal data, and a handful of standard Microsoft tools. Realistic timeline: 2–3 months with an experienced partner and fast internal decisions.
- Typical: Full migration of email, files, devices, and user accounts for an organization under 100 people. Realistic timeline: 3–6 months.
- Complex: You have heavily customized SharePoint, multiple tenants, or non-Microsoft systems deeply integrated into your workflows. Realistic timeline: 6–12+ months.
The part most timelines don’t account for
The migration itself usually isn’t what blows your deadline — your internal process is. Getting leadership aligned, defining what’s in scope, and coordinating with subcontractors all take time that doesn’t show up on your IT partner’s project plan. If you’re considering a hybrid model where only some users move to GCC High, expect more decisions from more stakeholders, which means more delays.
Critical success factors
Based on what delays or derails most projects, here’s what actually makes migrations succeed:
- Start evaluation at least 6 months before your CMMC assessment or contract deadline—longer if your environment is complex
- Do the upfront planning work: Define scope (full migration, limited enclave, or hybrid model). Inventory integrations and identity dependencies—third-party tools that don’t work in GCC High cause the most schedule disruption. Review contract language to identify which clauses require U.S.-only access. Determine your minimum CUI footprint to control cost. Clarify purchasing mechanics and who handles which compliance tasks.
- Involve compliance expertise from day one, not after migration
- Budget for training and change management, especially for executives and staff who collaborate externally
Is Microsoft 365 GCC High worth it?
If you’ve worked through the decision framework above and GCC High is clearly required—ITAR data, prime contractor mandates, or CDI with meaningful defense revenue—the question isn’t whether it’s worth it. It’s how to implement it well.
If you’re still uncertain, test these three factors:
Scope: Can you legally or operationally isolate CUI to a small user set? If yes, a hybrid approach may reduce cost while meeting compliance requirements.
Risk vs. cost: Model the direct and hidden costs of GCC High against the potential cost of non-compliance—lost bids, contract suspension, emergency migrations, or ITAR violations. If the compliance risk exceeds the GCC High premium, the decision is clear.
Execution readiness: Do you have documented responsibilities, migration playbooks, and compliance partners in place? If not, add time and budget before you commit to a timeline.
Two lessons from dozens of GCC High implementations
First, scope everything. Reduce what needs to live in GCC High to the absolute minimum. Keep your CUI footprint tight, document it, and set clear boundaries for who can access what. That approach controls cost, reduces migration complexity, and preserves productivity for the rest of the organization.
Second, integrate compliance into operations. Build runbooks, monitoring, and training into your workflow rather than treating compliance as a one-time project. GCC High doesn’t make you compliant—your operations do.
How do I purchase Microsoft 365 GCC High?
Until 2018, GCC High was only available directly from Microsoft through Enterprise Agreements with a 500-user minimum. As CMMC requirements expanded to smaller contractors, Microsoft began selling GCC High licenses through select partners. The most significant shift came in late 2025, when Microsoft released Business Premium licensing for GCC High making the platform affordable for small and mid-sized contractors.
This timing matters. Affordable GCC High licensing and CMMC enforcement both arrived in late 2025, so the market for small contractor implementations is relatively new. What’s not new is hardening Microsoft environments for compliance—we’ve been doing that for defense contractors for years. The licensing tier changed; the compliance methodology didn’t.
Your eligibility must be verified directly with Microsoft before purchase. We provide both GCC and GCC High licenses through our Microsoft partner relationships and help prepare the eligibility documentation Microsoft requires.
How we help contractors in the Virginia and DC area
Most consultants start with the technology. We start by helping you determine whether GCC High is actually necessary—and if it is, how to minimize what lives there.
Our approach focuses on reducing scope first: we help you identify exactly what data requires GCC High protection, map which tools and integrations will be affected, and build a migration plan that keeps only what’s necessary in the more expensive environment. This reduces both cost and timeline.
We also provide compliance documentation templates and a tested migration checklist so you’re not building processes from scratch or discovering gaps mid-project.
Next steps
If you’ve read this far, you’re doing your due diligence—which is exactly the right approach. GCC High is a significant investment, and the wrong decision costs money either way: overspending on infrastructure you don’t need or scrambling to fix compliance gaps when a contract is on the line.
Whether GCC High is right for you or not, we’ll give you a straight answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do we really need GCC High?
If DoD work is part of your growth plan, starting in GCC High is often the safer long-term decision—even if GCC appears sufficient today.
Can we start in GCC and move to GCC High later?
Yes, but moving later almost always costs more and disrupts operations. Many clients find they would have saved time and money by starting in GCC High.
Will GCC High slow us down?
For most teams, day-to-day work looks the same once users are trained. The bigger challenge is change management, not productivity loss.
CMMC RESOURCES
If you need CMMC managed IT services
- Virginia CMMC Managed IT Services
- Best CMMC managed IT services providers in the DMV
- Best Virginia CMMC managed IT services providers
If you need to better understand CMMC requirements:
- The Ultimate Guide to CMMC
- The Ultimate Guide to DFARS and NIST 800-171 (in plain English)
- What is FCI and should I worry about it?
- What is CUI and should I worry about it?
- CMMC compliance deadlines: Key dates and what they mean
- How long does CMMC compliance really take?
If you’re looking for CMMC tools and training:
- We found the best GRC tool for CMMC
- What is Microsoft GCC High and do I need it?
- Best CMMC training resources
- CMMC Level 1 guide as audio book
- CMMC Level 2 guide as audio book
- CUI enclaves in CMMC compliance: Are they right for your business?
If you’re looking for a CMMC consultant or Registered Practitioner Organization:
- Best CMMC consultants
- Best CMMC RPOs near Washington, DC
- Best Virginia Registered Practitioner Organizations
- Case Study: Virginia Government Contractor Nears CMMC Compliance
- CMMC Gap Analysis
If you’re looking for a CMMC assessor:
If you’re looking for information about CMMC that is targeted toward smaller businesses:
Complimentary review with a veteran engineer
Are you ready for CMMC?
Get a free strategic consultation to start your journey toward CMMC compliance.
